Sunday, April 15, 2012

More quackery

In addition to providing a spectacular wildlife attractant, the 26 acre detention pond (which will in effect be a retention pond because it will be maintained at a permanent level) presents another very real threat. Just how is the proposed CTA going to keep that pond filled during a severe drought? Where is the water coming from?

For your amusement, here is a conceptual sketch (from the EID) of the ‘duck pond’ and ‘future recreation facility’ complete with docks and boats.


Does it get any nuttier than this?