Bastrop County has been dealing with the Central Texas Airport/Greenport pipe-dream for nearly 15 years. It has always been and will undoubtedly continue to be all smoke and mirrors and hype. Don't take our word for it. The entire history is documented, much of it in the developer's own words, obtained from FOIA and ORR requests, in the "Documents" and "Factoids" sections of this website.

A corporation, Carpenter & Associates, with the blessings of the Bastrop County Commissioners wants to build a privately-funded Central Texas Airport in western Bastrop county. The plan has been in the works and under the radar for several years. It's hardly been headline news . . . until now.

Carpenter & Associates attorneys submitted the first draft of the 381 Agreement in August 2009. The document went through several revisions. It was approved and signed in June 2010 with NO PUBLIC INPUT. There are shortcomings in the 381 Agreement that threaten the health, safety, and financial welfare of area residents. The fiscal woes this project could bring to all of Bastrop County were also not carefully considered.

The 381 Agreement would

  • Put Cedar Creek High School students at risk from low flying planes and noise pollution
  • Allow Boeing 737-Class cargo aircraft up to 100 tons to operate from the CTA
  • Allow up to 250 flights daily of large aircraft approaching lower than 100 feet over populated areas
  • Remove FAA regulations including the FAA Wildlife Hazard Zone safety recommendations that would protect Bastrop county residents and air travelers
  • Compromise security by allowing the CTA to accept international flights with only 'Private Security' supervision

Environmental and property rights abuses

  • Use of jet fuel, de-icing fluid and other toxic chemicals in or near flood plains of the Colorado River, its tributaries and out-croppings of the Carrizo aquifer would threaten water quality.
  • Increased air, water, light and noise pollution would degrade quality of life.
  • No Environmental Impact Study, on-site noise study or traffic impact study has been submitted.
  • Property rights within the Airport Compatibility Zone (see insert) would be limited and property valuations would decline.
  • No funding for property acquisition in areas made uninhabitable by jet noise has been allocated.

Other Considerations

  • There was NO PUBLIC INPUT as to the merit of the project.
  • Two airports serving similar clientele - Austin Bergstrom International and Austin Executive - already exist within 13 miles of the proposed CTA. Another airport is redundant.
  • The project is not clearly defined and no construction plans have been submitted.
  • Specifications of size, type and purpose of aircraft allowed at the airport are incompletely defined in the 381 Agreement.
  • The 'Mutual Assistance' clause of the 381 Agreement obligates the County to assist the developer in every way including financial. Can you say bailout?
  • The developer has a less than stellar reputation including a 2009 civil judgment upholding a verdict of 'fraud and breach of fiduciary duty'. (Sandra McBeth v. James R. Carpenter)

Copyright © 2010-2023 Stop CTA! - All Rights Reserved.